Unless the network is lying to me again, JC Dill said: > I've read about *many* legitimate opt-in discussion lists that have been > blocked at AOL, and the onerous contract AOL wants list owners to sign > to be unblocked. In one case, the contract stated that if you signed it > you couldn't disclose it. A list owner discussed this *proposed* > contract with his lawyer and they determined that if he *didn't* sign > it, he *could* disclose the terms of the contract, and that's what he > did. It's out there on the web somewhere. It is a very depressing > story, he had to let his AOL subscribers lose so that the rest of us > could know what AOL was up to (and may still be up to, who knows?).
That would be me: http://www.mailinglists.org/aol AlanC {who has sent mail to the EFF address already} -- I must study politics and war that my sons | may have liberty to study mathematics and | [EMAIL PROTECTED] philosophy. -- John Adams |
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
