>>>>> "BAW" == Barry A Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
BAW> Reply-To munging isn't necessary here. The list s/w can suppress the BAW> list copy if the member is explicitly mentioned in a recipient header. BAW> It can also collapse CC headers for subsequent postings. I'd suspect BAW> that of those 19, that behavior would be just fine for 18 of them. BAW> For the others, something like actual MUA support for Mail-Copies-To BAW> would be sufficient. I just set up my mail program (VM under XEmacs) to auto-delete messages with identical Message-ID headers. It solves this problem quite nicely, and at much less cost than the bandwidth wasted on this whole discussion ;-) No need to rely on MLMs to do it, or on other people's mail programs doing the right thing... -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khera, Ph.D. Khera Communications, Inc. Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Rockville, MD +1-240-453-8497 AIM: vivekkhera Y!: vivek_khera http://www.khera.org/~vivek/
