hi ya anne
> Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. wrote:
>
> > i say that is a worst piece of spam and junkmail in this list to date
.
> Anyways, if so, I sincerely apologize!
well looks like i've been outvoted ... so for that i apologize to you Anne
( maybe i should keep quiet and lurk too .. )
but before i do that.. just wanted to say that even if a post is
on topic, it can still be considered spam .. :-)
- everybody's definition of spam is different
- for me ...
- any spam/virus filter that allows "false positives" is worthless to me
( 2x - 3x much faster to simply hit "d" once than to worry abouot
( if a real email went to the (supposedly) spam bunket that is NOT
( checked as often
- and the habeas one was "deemed spam" due to excessive headers
and contains no useful info .. just one line for the url suffice
( see below )
i am heading down the road to spam-hell..:-0 for my punishment... hehehee
again, my apologies for posting my initial spam comment..
thanx
alvin
X> Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X> X-Habeas-SWE-1: winter into spring
X> X-Habeas-SWE-2: brightly anticipated
X> X-Habeas-SWE-3: like Habeas SWE (tm)
X> X-Habeas-SWE-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm)
X> X-Habeas-SWE-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this
X> X-Habeas-SWE-6: email in exchange for a license for this Habeas
X> X-Habeas-SWE-7: warrant mark warrants that this is a Habeas Compliant
X> X-Habeas-SWE-8: Message (HCM) and not spam. Please report use of this
X> X-Habeas-SWE-9: mark in spam to <http://www.habeas.com/report/>.
X> Organization: Habeas - the email you want
X> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
