I'm not terribly familiar with that specific fail-over system, but it should be semi-supported. By that, I mean that it would kick over to an alternate server, but you're not going to save state information (session, application) between servers.. if you want to use a fail over system, you'll need to come up with a custom mechanism for storing state (some sorta GUID passed via URL that is stored in a central system, like a db) -- Billy Cravens HR Web Development, Sabre [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Sorge, Bruce" wrote: > Anyone know if CF 5.0 supports Windows 2000 Active Server Clustering > fail over? I know that 5.0 Enterprise comes with ClusterCats, but we > do not want to use that if we do not have to.Thanks,Bruce > SorgePhysician & Portal ServicesBaylor Health Care SystemDallas, > TX214-820-3142 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This email server is running an evaluation copy of the MailShield anti- spam software. Please contact your email administrator if you have any questions about this message. MailShield product info: www.mailshield.com ----------------------------------------------- To post, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe / unsubscribe: http://www.dfwcfug.org
