Why do you say you are wrong about persistence? I appreciate your feedback.
Thanks - Tom Schreck 817-252-4900 [EMAIL PROTECTED] I have not failed. I've found 10,000 ways that won't work. - Thomas Edison -----Original Message----- From: S. Isaac Dealey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 9:51 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CFC Question Hmmm... I guess I was wrong about persistence... That's going to make my movement to MX interresting... > I'm modeling my Objects after my database structure. Each object > represents a table. Whenever I instantiate the object I pull all the > information about the object together. I think this is a little > overkill; I'm just playing around to see what I can do with it. > What rules of thumb/guidelines do you go by when modeling your objects? > Do you base it upon a table structure, or perhaps how the objects > interact with each other? My initial guidelines are something Hal Helms > mentioned about objects. He said to the effect that an object should > contain everything it knows about itself. For instance, a person knows > his/her name, age, birth date, sex, etc. So, I instantiate an object by > passing its unique ID into a method. I then go through the database > structure and pull the data I can "find" for that ID into the object. > This seems like a lot of overhead because I have to pull all of this > data together for each instantiation. I may only use part of the data > available to me at any one point in my application. How does CF manage > the data pulled together for an object? Is it stored in memory? > Is there a better way to model your objects? It seems like a natural > fit to model it against your database structure, but it seems like too > much overhead: why not just query against the table when you need the > data? Anyways, if anyone has any advice on better ways to model I would > appreciate their advice. > Thanks - > Tom Schreck > 817-252-4900 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > I have not failed. I've found 10,000 ways that won't work. > - Thomas Edison > -----Original Message----- > From: Billy Cravens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 8:09 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: CFC Question > From a technical standpoint, there's nothing wrong with what you're > doing (perhaps each instance of an object has a performance hit, but I > doubt it's significant). > However, I would focus on your objects from an abstract view. Are your > 2 objects working on different "items"? > For example: > 1) I have an "orders" object. I want to look at a particular > order, and return a recordset containing all items in that order. In > this instance, I would only have a single object, "orders", since > everything is so closely related. > 2) I want to pull a recordset containing all orders placed by a > certain customer. In this situation, you might have a customers object, > that interacts with an orders object. > I think we will see many different approaches for interfacing with CFCs: > the most basic encapsulation, replacements for custom tags, etc. > However, I think the true power of CFC's come when you use them to model > the real world. > ************************** > Billy Cravens > Web and Software consulting > www.Architechx.com > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On > Behalf Of Schreck, Tom > Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 11:57 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: CFC Question > I've been experimenting with CFCs and am excited about the potential. I > see how it's a switch in perspective of how you model your application. > I've created an object, Object A, which has a 1-to-many relationship > with another object, Object B. I created a function of Object A which > returns a recordset of all records from Object B related to Object A. > So, whenever I instantiate Object A, I have available to me all records > related to Object A that belong to Object B. This is stored in Object A > as this.ListObjectB. Is this good practice? Where does all of the > information about an object get stored when you instantiate it? Should > you "store" a recordset of data in an object, or just call a function to > return the recordset whenever you need it? Does anyone have > guidelines/best practices for working with CFC? > Thanks - > Tom Schreck > 817-252-4900 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > I have not failed. I've found 10,000 ways that won't work. > - Thomas Edison S. Isaac Dealey Certified Advanced ColdFusion 5 Developer www.turnkey.to 954-776-0046 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ - This email server is running an evaluation copy of the MailShield anti- spam software. Please contact your email administrator if you have any questions about this message. MailShield product info: www.mailshield.com ----------------------------------------------- To post, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe / unsubscribe: http://www.dfwcfug.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This email server is running an evaluation copy of the MailShield anti- spam software. Please contact your email administrator if you have any questions about this message. MailShield product info: www.mailshield.com ----------------------------------------------- To post, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe / unsubscribe: http://www.dfwcfug.org
