Would you please elaborate? I did not know about
OnRequestEnd.cfm templates, which could prove to be quite useful. I'm just
not quite sure I understand how it would help our current
situation.
BTW, was anybody hit with the SQL Slammer attack?
Perhaps coincidentally, we started having similar problems last Thursday, which
was two days prior to the "big one". We apparently are still having
occasional slowdowns, although our IT people have been unable to confirm or deny
it. All I know is that we are getting error messages resulting from
timeouts (we timeout at 45 seconds).
Thanks for your assistance.
Karen R. Harker, MLS
UT Southwestern Medical Library
5323 Harry Hines Blvd.
Dallas, TX 75390-9049
214-648-1698
http://www.swmed.edu/library/
UT Southwestern Medical Library
5323 Harry Hines Blvd.
Dallas, TX 75390-9049
214-648-1698
http://www.swmed.edu/library/
Karen R. Harker, MLS
UT Southwestern Medical Library
5323 Harry Hines Blvd.
Dallas, TX 75390-9049
214-648-1698
http://www.swmed.edu/library/
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1/27/03 6:08:01 PM >>>
If you OnRequestEnd.cfm the you get the same CGI variables and if you are
using hub-n-spoke technique the tracking capabilities are innocuous and
powerful. The HTTP exchange can be quite verbose so I try to "minimize"
it.
You could put tcpdump with ethereal or some other packet sniffer to track
the conversation.
a lurker
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Karen Harker
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 2:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Response time and CFLOCATION
We have been using a link hit counter to track which links our users are
selecting. This involves passing a linkID number to a "linkUsage.cfm"
template, that does these things:
1) Finds the right table (1/month) and creates a new one, if needed (i.e.
the beginning of the month)
2) Inserts a row in this table
3) Finds the URL based on the linkID
4) Uses CFLOCATION to send the user on this URL.
Response time for such an application is getting too long (upwards of 10
seconds). I've tested the system up to the point of the CFLOCATION tag
and the response times have averaged about 260 milliseconds (0.260 sec?),
which seems reasonable. So that leaves the CFLOCATION tag as the
potential reason for the slow response. Does anybody else have info about
CFLOCATION and its potential slowness?
Does anybody else have a better solution?
Thanks.
Karen R. Harker, MLS
UT Southwestern Medical Library
5323 Harry Hines Blvd.
Dallas, TX 75390-9049
214-648-1698
http://www.swmed.edu/library/
-----------------------------------------------
To post, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:
Send UNSUBSCRIBE to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe / unsubscribe: http://www.dfwcfug.org
UT Southwestern Medical Library
5323 Harry Hines Blvd.
Dallas, TX 75390-9049
214-648-1698
http://www.swmed.edu/library/
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1/27/03 6:08:01 PM >>>
If you OnRequestEnd.cfm the you get the same CGI variables and if you are
using hub-n-spoke technique the tracking capabilities are innocuous and
powerful. The HTTP exchange can be quite verbose so I try to "minimize"
it.
You could put tcpdump with ethereal or some other packet sniffer to track
the conversation.
a lurker
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Karen Harker
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 2:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Response time and CFLOCATION
We have been using a link hit counter to track which links our users are
selecting. This involves passing a linkID number to a "linkUsage.cfm"
template, that does these things:
1) Finds the right table (1/month) and creates a new one, if needed (i.e.
the beginning of the month)
2) Inserts a row in this table
3) Finds the URL based on the linkID
4) Uses CFLOCATION to send the user on this URL.
Response time for such an application is getting too long (upwards of 10
seconds). I've tested the system up to the point of the CFLOCATION tag
and the response times have averaged about 260 milliseconds (0.260 sec?),
which seems reasonable. So that leaves the CFLOCATION tag as the
potential reason for the slow response. Does anybody else have info about
CFLOCATION and its potential slowness?
Does anybody else have a better solution?
Thanks.
Karen R. Harker, MLS
UT Southwestern Medical Library
5323 Harry Hines Blvd.
Dallas, TX 75390-9049
214-648-1698
http://www.swmed.edu/library/
-----------------------------------------------
To post, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:
Send UNSUBSCRIBE to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe / unsubscribe: http://www.dfwcfug.org
