I haven't looked deeply at it myself. I know Sean Corfield, the Director of Architecture at MM has been pretty impressed with it. He's also been having a look at the onTap framework although he hasn't given me any specific feedback yet. He's been pretty busy lately, but he's a great guy. :) And at first glance he said it looked like a good idea. http://www.turnkey.to/ontap ... I know that's probably not what you were wanting, but for comparison. I'm sure neither is right for every job. Someone on the cf-talk list today said something about the sample app(s) being somewhat slow, but I can't remember who and I haven't seen it myself, so I can't speak to its efficiency. But you can google-search the hof site for it. It's been one of the largest threads on cf-talk today.
s. isaac dealey 972-490-6624 team macromedia volunteer http://www.macromedia.com/go/team chief architect, tapestry cms http://products.turnkey.to onTap is open source http://www.turnkey.to/ontap > Anyone looked (more than just surface level) into Hal > Helms and Ben Edwards > Mach II application architecture (www.mach-ii.com > <http://www.mach-ii.com> > )? > I am looking for comments, pros and cons, etc. of that > application > architecture - especially for use in a very large intranet > application > framework. > Thanks in advance, > _____ > Matt Knight ►Dresser Corporate Web Team ► Dresser, > Inc. ► w: 972 361 9943 ► > m: 214 213 4016 ----------------------------------------------- To post, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe: Send UNSUBSCRIBE to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe / unsubscribe: http://www.dfwcfug.org
