|
Tom,
We use try/catch blocks all over the place in our code and
have never noticed a significant performance hit. You could try using
getTickCount() around the code both with and without the try/catch block and
should get an idea of any performance hit. I suspect it will be minimal if
you can even note a difference.
Hope this helps,
Tom Woestman From: Schreck, Thomas (PPC) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 1:24 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: try catch issue We arrange modules in a layout and
programmatically generate the layout into a .cfm page. We are using
<cfimport> tag to call the modules instead of <cfmodule> because
<cfmodule> is slow. Anyways, the issue at hand is how to best manage
when a module produces an error. Ideally, we would like to have the module
handle this itself, but we are dealing with a lot of pre-existing modules, so
going back to each one is time consuming and not an
option. That said, what do you think about
wrapping a <cftry>/<cfcatch> around each module call within the
programmatically generated page? How costly is
<cftry>/<cfcatch> in terms of performance?
Thanks
- Tom
Schreck 817-252-4900 [EMAIL PROTECTED] I have not failed. I've found
10,000 ways that won't work. - Thomas Edison |
- RE: try catch issue Tom Woestman
- Another Problem for new user Robert Shaw
- RE: Another Problem for new user Tom Nunamaker
