You'll notice that
using a variable in the returntype attribute yields a different error than
specifying an invalid hard-coded returntype. CF must do a syntax pass
before a lexical pass, or some compiler terminology like that, on
those attributes.
-
Daniel
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Mike Ferris
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 2:05 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Dynamic evaluation of ReturnTypeFerg,No offense taken. It never hurts to validate assumptions someone is making, that is often where the problem lies. Yes, we have verified the value of the request variable by creating a function to output the request variable. And, the component does exist there as we can call the component successfully when hardcoding the path.It is probably like Dan says and they must be hardcoded. We just wanted to verify this outside ourselves.Thanks,Mike
