Thanks for your help!  I'll check those out.

Thanks,
Tim 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Matt Woodward
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 8:22 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Flash Communication Server

We use LoadRunner but I know it's damn expensive, so it depends on
your budget.  LoadRunner is very, very slick and highly scriptable. 
Microsoft has a free load testing tool that a lot of people swear
by--I think the acronym for it is WSAT or something like that.

Just make sure whatever you do, run the load testing app on an actual
server-class machine, not just someone's desktop or laptop.  If you
run it from a laptop you're basically stress-testing the laptop more
than the server you're trying to test.  If you have an actual server
to run it from you'll get more accurate results.

Matt

On 4/26/05, Tim Starling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks!  Is there a specific load test tool you would recommend?
> 
> Thanks,
> Tim
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Matt Woodward
> Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 7:09 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Flash Communication Server
> 
> On 4/26/05, Tim Starling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Do you think there would be an issue with having the site, running CF
MX7,
> and Flash Com server all running on the same server?
> 
> That's one of those things you'd just have to test in your environment
> to know whether or not it will fly.  It depends on hardware, usage,
> number of users, number of streams, amount of interactivity, etc., all
> of which will impact the total number of possible users.  You would
> definitely want to load test things using an automated load testing
> tool before you launched a high-volume production app.
> 
> We currently have FCS and CFMX 7 on the same box, which is a 2.8GHz
> dual processor with 2.5GB RAM, but since we haven't really used FCS
> very much I unfortunately don't have any usage stats, etc. to share.
> I'm definitely going to have to load test our setup before we use FCS,
> which will initially probably be for internal webcasts.  When I start
> doing that I'll be sure and share anything I find out.
> 
> Matt
> --
> Matt Woodward
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.mattwoodward.com
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> To post, send email to [email protected]
> To unsubscribe:
>    http://www.dfwcfug.org/form_MemberUnsubscribe.cfm
> To subscribe:
>    http://www.dfwcfug.org/form_MemberRegistration.cfm
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> To post, send email to [email protected]
> To unsubscribe:
>    http://www.dfwcfug.org/form_MemberUnsubscribe.cfm
> To subscribe:
>    http://www.dfwcfug.org/form_MemberRegistration.cfm
> 
> 


-- 
Matt Woodward
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.mattwoodward.com
----------------------------------------------------------
To post, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe: 
   http://www.dfwcfug.org/form_MemberUnsubscribe.cfm
To subscribe: 
   http://www.dfwcfug.org/form_MemberRegistration.cfm






----------------------------------------------------------
To post, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe: 
   http://www.dfwcfug.org/form_MemberUnsubscribe.cfm
To subscribe: 
   http://www.dfwcfug.org/form_MemberRegistration.cfm


Reply via email to