The email verification for an IP address would probably seem weird to most
people. I haven't seen anything like that. HTTP doesn't get the same info
that STMP conversations record. You basically just have the CGI variables
and there is no way to definitively recognize a user. That's why the whole
Unique Visitors stats for websites are bogus.

Your captcha will stops the bots. As for the unwanted people, I don't think
technology is going to solve that problem. Perhaps some friendly
correspondence. ;)

- Daniel


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Jake McKee
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 10:24 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: What specific info?

Heh.... yeah, IP is not the best way to go, nor is cookies. I noticed 
that Lawrence Lessing's blog ties in your computer's IP to spammer lists 
(or something like that). Interesting approach, although the IP thing is 
still a kicker.

So there's two issues here:

Spam - both POST calls from spambot programs, and actual people trying 
to get around my captcha protection, email verification, etc..

Pains in the Asses - people who I just don't want to hear from for 
whatever reason.

Either way, the issue is basically the same, in many ways. Not in others.

I've actually thought maybe a smart way to do it would be to do a type 
of email verification. The obvious method would be requiring a real 
person to click a link in an email every time they post a comment. I 
suppose I could do that concept, but only once - they click a link to 
verify their IP address, only once. If their IP changed, they'd have to 
re-confirm. For some people, this wouldn't happen that often. For others 
(corporate firewall users or whatever), they may have to do it 
regularly... which is more like standard email validation mentioned above.

Of course the weirdness there comes into play if an approved IP is 
picked up by a spammer.

So here's what prompted the original question - I was noticing a feature 
in Thunderbird that allows me to easily view the header info on an 
email. I was hoping that there might be something similar (of course not 
as in depth) for Web site browsers, beyond just IP.

Jake

Daniel Elmore wrote:

>What types of spam are you getting? Bot POST calls or are these actual
>people?
>
>There isn't much you can do to recognize a specific person. There's cookies
>but I would rely on an IP match over a cookie match. According to Jupiter
>Research reports, 39% of users delete cookies on a regular basis. Plus bots
>don't store cookies and most spammers block cookies. The main thing you
have
>to worry about with IP records is proxies. I don't know how much work your
>willing to put into this but, most major ISPs that use proxies make a list
>of their network IP's publicly available. Combine that with a list of all
>public and anonymous proxy servers and you would have a pretty good list.
>All that list would do is flag that you should _not_ ban that user's IP (it
>could be used by a another user at a completely different location.) There
>are more issues to deal with too, such as shared broadband connections,
>corporate firewalls. Well, I bet you are ready to give up on the IP
matching
>thing after hearing this. So, answer the questions above more specifically
>and I'll see if I can help in another way.
>
>- Daniel
> 
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
>Of Jake McKee
>Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 12:57 AM
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: What specific info?
>
>All,
>
>I've been trying to figure out some better ways to avoid comment spam on 
>my blog. I've implemented and worked on a number of ideas in general.
>
>from the past.But specifically looking at one particular idea for a 
>minute - capturing user data when they submit a comment and if it 
>matches "known" spammers Besides IP address (which we all know is 
>questionable at best), what other "personal" information can I grab when 
>the user submits a form?
>
>Thanks!
>Jake
>
>----------------------------------------------------------
>To post, send email to [email protected]
>To unsubscribe: 
>   http://www.dfwcfug.org/form_MemberUnsubscribe.cfm
>To subscribe: 
>   http://www.dfwcfug.org/form_MemberRegistration.cfm
>
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------
>To post, send email to [email protected]
>To unsubscribe: 
>   http://www.dfwcfug.org/form_MemberUnsubscribe.cfm
>To subscribe: 
>   http://www.dfwcfug.org/form_MemberRegistration.cfm
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  
>

----------------------------------------------------------
To post, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe: 
   http://www.dfwcfug.org/form_MemberUnsubscribe.cfm
To subscribe: 
   http://www.dfwcfug.org/form_MemberRegistration.cfm



----------------------------------------------------------
To post, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe: 
   http://www.dfwcfug.org/form_MemberUnsubscribe.cfm
To subscribe: 
   http://www.dfwcfug.org/form_MemberRegistration.cfm


Reply via email to