of course you don't pay for a car payment, oil change, new tires, registration, gas, and various other misc charges with bart. plus if you commute to the city you pay 8 bux a day for parking anyway. at least on bart you can read your paper rather than honk your horn. If you don't find any incentive to save the enviornment for it's own sake then you either don't care or aren't properly informed. If it is more convenient for you to drive to work then do so, however, apx. 250,000 riders per day have decided that it is not.

And the two main factors contributing to California's deficit have been 1.) the fall of the dot coms, and 2.) the usage of state funds to supplement the purchasing of energy from corporate entities.

the first part of this had to do with bad investing from Venture Capitalists and the second is most largely attributed to the deregulation of the energy industry, instituted, in part, by Pete Wilson. The idea that Corporations will put aside profit margins for public interest is fallacious at best.

When the a series of BART bonds were voted upon by residents in San Francisco, Alameda, San Mateo and Contra Costa counties between 1992 and 1996 to expand the system, the only thing the politicians did was cast their vote as a member of the public if they lived in those districts... it wasn't a legislative action.

As for Grey Davis, I don't think that he has shown much leadership to help correct the problems, but that doesn't mean that his government is to blame... more reason to vote green in 2004

foo



" *last nite* Soon as I felt it comin on I should've quit, but it's true that a drunk ain't shit." -- DJ Quik





From: "Mine ? Mine ? Mine ?" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [D] nrr: your politicians at work, folks (rant)
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 14:05:49 -0500

http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2003/06/23/BA124129.DTL

that's right, folks.

so let's break it down for some of you folks who do work more than 7 miles
from town:
polits want you to stop using your car, save the environment, use public
transportation, yada yada noble ideal cause yada.

so let's say you take bart to work:

you pay $2 for parking
or, you find that bart has closed your parking lot and are using it for
longterm parking, charging a whopping $7, hereby squeezing the car drivers
to pay for that monthly parking or have them duke it out for parking spot
in tiny tiny garage.

you pay $$$$ for bart ticket, which will increase once again in january,
costing you a potential extra $20 a month to go to work.

you find out the shuttle that goes to your workplace is moved to an even
FURTHER bart station, costing you an additional $20, and find out that
shuttle only makes you need to add ONE HOUR to your commute time. in fact,
if you actually DROVE to work, you'd get to leave LATER from home, and get
back EARLIER.

where exactly is the incentive to save the environment and ride public
transportation ?

oh, i get it. gray davis and co want to make it extremely
difficult/inconvenient for you to go to work i see how that boosts our
economy. really.

as far as i know, when wilson left, we actually had a surplus in the
budget. now we're how many billion in deficit ?

i didn't vote for that fucker,
one disgruntled employee/

___________________________________________________________________
The D mailing list                   http://www.djdenise.com/
Check out the new forum!             http://www.djdenise.com/forum/

_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus


___________________________________________________________________
The D mailing list                   http://www.djdenise.com/
Check out the new forum!             http://www.djdenise.com/forum/

Reply via email to