On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 12:02:15AM +0700, Max wrote:
> Would't it be fine to have hooks
> - for all numerics replies (by their RPL_names)
> or to group ERR_ replies into one hook ?
sounds like a good thing, at first. However, i guess every Network has a
different Name for the same Numerics, so senseless.
> - for each nonnumerics messages:
> PRIVMSG, NICK, JOIN, PART, etc
umm. You actually have those; they are sometimes just much more special.
(i.e. public_msg for MSGs on channels where the origin isnt on that
channel). Although it seems difficult for me to vote for yes or no, i'd
actually vote for no, since i dont see how this could make my Life as
scripter easier and i dont either see a reason to implement it.
> - one for ctcp, with type as one of arg
epic has /on ctcp(_reply), afaics.
Its pretty easy to make simple Hooks, with one Hook per Type.
You would choose something like
on ^ctcp "% % SMILE *" echo LAUGH LAUGH LAUGH
where SMILE is the type of ctcp. You might refer to the Docs at
http://www.epicsol.org for further info.
> - for dcc
It also has, see above URL.
> For backwards compatability is it possible
> to generate/throw events in scripts ?
Probably? I dont understand what you mean, but why dont you just try it?
-mc
--
| Rico -mc- Gloeckner | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | {ICQ:99798577} |
| <http://1048576735> | mc @ irc.tu-ilmenau.de | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |
| :wq
_______________________________________________
List mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://epicsol.org/mailman/listinfo/list
