mask() shouldn't be classful anymore
or whatever it is that does that
there are too many 12/24/64/65/66 addresses that get interpreted as *!*@nn.*
or maybe we need another range of numbers added to mask types to
make ips not be interpreted classfully, so if i do:
mask(11 lamer!~[EMAIL PROTECTED])
i will get:
*!*lamer94*@66.122.218.*
instead of:
*!*lamer94*@66.*
please? :)
-wjr
--
+------------------+
| William Rockwood | Sr. System Administrator
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | XO Communications, Chicago DCO
+------------------+
_______________________________________________
List mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://epicsol.org/mailman/listinfo/list
