Request for discussion: /set auto_unmark_away The behavior of the auto_unmark_away /set is currently at odds with its documentation, however, it isn't clear what the best way to handle auto_unmark_away is, and it was suggested by hop that I bring it up on the list for discussion before any changes were made.
The documentation says that the send_line keybinding triggers auto_unmark_away. The actual implementation is that /msg and /notice trigger auto_unmark_away, unless they were issued in silent mode (ie with a ^ prefix) In reality, the behavior of auto_unmark_away could be easily handled by a script, easily allowing the client to support both behaviors. So, which is better? Changing the code to match the documentation, changing the documentation to match the code, or removing auto_unmark_away altogether, and including a script with the client to provide the same function? Any comments on the matter would be greatly appreciated. -dracus _______________________________________________ List mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://epicsol.org/mailman/listinfo/list
