Re: [gundam] [model] MG Zeta 2.0 pic in Dec Hobby Japan

Mon, 14 Nov 2005 08:50:24 -0800

Yeah, skininess is a problem. I think it's from the scaling down from PG to MG size. As you have to maintain the structure and strength, you're proportionally having more "plastic" in MG than PG... as you cannot make the plastic pieces too thin. i.e, you got less empty space. So you have to make parts that'd fit into these spaces, like the Zeta arms which has less need of plastic strength as it's not involved in the body transformation, more skinny. At least that's how I can justify the changes whenever I see one.


On 11/12/05, Lim Yew Aik/Keat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Length-wise looks ok when extended. Still looks odd when it is in 'plane' mode, the shield still looks small, or should I say 'skinny'?
 
Overall proportion seems to look more 'dynamic', but some parts too skinny, and surface details seems to lose to ver.1. Still under my 'buy-list'. =)
 
- PG still the best!!! =P -
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2005 1:12 AM
Subject: Re: [gundam] [model] MG Zeta 2.0 pic in Dec Hobby Japan

The standing pose picture is probably not representative for the shield... it is in retracted mode there. You'll see if you compare it to the mid-left photo.

On 11/11/05, Lim Yew Aik/Keat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think the shield looks way too small.....
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, November 11, 2005 4:34 AM
Subject: Re: [gundam] [model] MG Zeta 2.0 pic in Dec Hobby Japan

There's now a bigger image but not the HJ scans.

http://www.s-coolboy.com/cgi-bin/topic.cgi?forum=6&topic=2018&show=0



On 11/7/05, Reynolds, Jason M. <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:

Could someone who has access to the picture save it and send it to the list?




--
Boaz
http://myturnaspace.blogspot.com



--
Boaz
http://myturnaspace.blogspot.com



--
Boaz
http://myturnaspace.blogspot.com

Reply via email to