Boaz wrote: > version (right) somwhat... " seems to be a comparison image of the 2 > version... does it mean there're differences between them aside from the > extra parts?
Yeah caught my eyes too, but until someone translate the caption, there isn't much to talk about. It's very intriguing for sure. The (Rick-)Dom and Black Tristar kits look like both excellent kits. Articulated skirt front, head innards, beautiful hands, articulated stand and cool gimmicks (love the bazooka shot effects). The mini photo shows the parts for Rick Dom vs. Dom. Good for the vanilla Dom discussion. > Can't tell as it's cut off by the edge. But as the partial captions that has > to use "?? version(right)" I think I can safely assume the beginning part > was "single-item production version (left)". Anyway if they're just putting The other clue is to look at the text to the left, which seems to list the special features of the Black Tristar set. (1) white hot heat rod, (2) bazooka shot effect, (3) grasped fists, (4) display stand (Rick Dom use something something attention!). There doesn't seem to be anything about the external appearance of the front view. Makes the side-by-side front view photo very strange. Ahh well, I don't care. I've seen enough, I'm buying! > And as speculated, Bandai do wanna rob us more by including stands even for > the HGUC Palace Athene.& Akutsuki. Likewise the (Rick-)Dom kit, technically it doesn't need a stand either. But I think the stand is a real win-win for Bandai. I think the stand will sell more kits, and for each kit sold, the revenue is higher (who would have expected Rick Dom to cost more than Rick Dom II and Dom Tropen?). Please, keep up the good robbery. -- Dr. Core -------------------------------------------------- The Gundam Mailing List MK-II [email protected] Archives: http://www.gundam.com/gml Help: Email [EMAIL PROTECTED] with this in the BODY: help list
