On 1/11/06, Dr. Core <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Why would you think GC Bigzam un-orthodox but not GC Quin Mantha?

AHA!  Thought you'd never ask.  Let's TRY to define orthodoxy:

orthodoxy (n.): [model] the state of a model kit being open to
customization, generally involving painting and/or modification,
without dis-assembly from the retail condition.

So: PG/MG/HG/UG/GK are all ortho. MSIA/GFIX are all not.  People
customize MSIA just like any model, but you have to dis-assemble (at
least) the limbs, nozzles, backpack etc before you can do anything
meaningful.


Wouldn't MSiA/GFF be "toys"? they're not model at all, not to say orthodox or not. For me even HCM pro, which has the word "model" in it, is not a model.


So GC WB is 100% ortho, except those three MS figures.  GC QM is say
75% ortho, since most people can mod/repaint with just masking.  GC BZ
is less than 50% ortho, since the legs (<50%) are ortho, but the bulk
body can't really be custom-painted without dis-assembly.


Apparently you're defining orthodoxy by measuring how much you need to dissemble before you make any changes to the kit such that it'd finish different from what Bandai intended it to be.Correct?

My definition was more as "how much its assembly is different from typical Bandai models". And as I don't have MSiA/GFF in the "model" category the GC WB is quite far in the spectrum.



> And no, I don't have space for display a GC Musai, and I have the EX Musai
> already.

It's only slightly larger than a bassinet!  OTOH perhaps a better
project for you is to mod a tricycle into a Musai.


Yeah right, have a GC Musai instead of a bassinet, and let the baby ride on the Musai instead. Talk about triggers of spouse homicide....

--
Boaz
http://myturnaspace.blogspot.com

Reply via email to