On 4/23/06, Dr. Core <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Okay, I was rushing to my kid's rescue.
I think my problem is that that article's suggestion is very narrow band... literally like "put muscles into Gundam mecha, and make it more bio-looking".
Boaz wrote:
> magazine's site, and they said in this page that after the failure of
> G-Savior Gundam has been stuck in its own old fashion, and need to have a
Hmm... I thought the text "commissioned to an American designer" as
referring to Turn-A not G-Savior. You could be right, but we can't be
totally sure from just the text.
Okay, I was rushing to my kid's rescue.
> I don't know about you, but I highly object their thinking... bio-engineered
> mecha is not Gundam.
How about Devil Gundam? Before you say nanotech, know that in real
life, the line between tissue/bio engineering and nanotech is
dissolving as we speak. I think there will be no distinction between
the two even before the first big application comes out.
I think my problem is that that article's suggestion is very narrow band... literally like "put muscles into Gundam mecha, and make it more bio-looking".
--
Boaz
http://myturnaspace.blogspot.com
