Criticism #1 (continued)
The Interim Report�s presentation of evidence and anecdotes is
selective and biased
========================================================

* The report ignores or minimizes evidence that trademark holders can,
and often do, abuse the rights of legitimate domain name registrants.
For example, at least three separate comment submissions in the WIPO
process referenced an independent study by Syracuse University
professor Milton Mueller. (That study categorized 121 cases of
publicly reported domain name-trademark conflicts and showed that 49%
of them were cases of �character string� conflicts, in which both
parties had a legitimate claim to the name and trademark law was being
exploited to engage in �reverse domain name grabbing.� Of the 121
cases, clear infringement constituted only 12% of the cases.) The
statistical results of this report were not mentioned in the text, and
the existence of the study was relegated to a footnote in a sentence
that claimed that �few comprehensive analyses supported by empirical
evidence are available.� (p. 81, para 254). In stark contrast, the
WIPO report devoted an entire paragraph to a discussion of the results
of a study commissioned by MARQUES, a European trademark association.
The MARQUES report, which consisted of little more than an opinion
poll of a small number of trademark lawyers, of course cited results
favorable to the claims of brand and trademark holders. (p. 81, para
255). Likewise, the WIPO Interim Report devotes entire pages to
recounting the anecdotes submitted to them by trademark holders (see
pages 82-86), but did not cite or report any countervailing evidence
presented to them by critics of the trademark interests.

The discriminatory treatment of evidence and comments is obvious.


__________________________________________________
To receive the digest version instead, send a
blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___END____________________________________________

Reply via email to