At 02:20 PM 1/22/99 -0500, Martin B. Schwimmer wrote:
>
>local trademark offices, I don't know - I do not automatically think it
>should be WIPO.
Please keep seying this and sayninf it loudly. WIPO seems to have the idea
it speaks for all TM interests and especially IP lawyers.
>I agree with Mr. Lovell that ultimately, if ICANN does not quickly gain the
>confidence of the stakeholders, then the issue of the DNS will be
>ultimately resolved by international treaty.
Nah. Keep reminding yourself the net is a colectionof private networks.
Slap an niternatinal treaty on it (which I'm guessing would take years)
and all us sysadmins would either fnd a way around it or pull up
stakes and use some other way to interoperate.
My god they can't even keep anything as blatently illegal as kiddie
porn and beastiality off the net. What make you think an international
treaty is going to affect anything.
--
"That's why there is a Protocol SO. To decide what the next
number after 16 is." - Dixon (tinc)
__________________________________________________
To receive the digest version instead, send a
blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___END____________________________________________
