Martin B. Schwimmer wrote: > > I looked at www.pseudo.org and at its whois print-out. One can't tell from > that what kind of use it is. what do they do? where is this info available? What does it matter what they do? It seems to me that it's of no consequence until they do it (whatever IT is), and I don't see anything misleading on that site. Are you suggesting that anyone who registers a domain name should be required to declare what they intend to do with it? Why should a trademark holder get a pre-emptive lock on a generic term like pseudo? After all, any other "pseudo" can register any other *pseudo*.* (given existing limitations of character restrictions, string lengths, available TLDs, etc.). ?? Craig Simon __________________________________________________ To receive the digest version instead, send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___END____________________________________________
- [ifwp] Re: yet another lame trademark issue jeff Williams
- [ifwp] Re: yet another lame trademark issue Martin B. Schwimmer
- [ifwp] Re: yet another lame trademark issue Mikki Barry
- [ifwp] Re: yet another lame trademark issue Bill Lovell
- [ifwp] Re: yet another lame trademark issue Bill Lovell
- [ifwp] Re: yet another lame trademark issue Mikki Barry
- [ifwp] Re: yet another lame trademark issue Bill Lovell
- [ifwp] Re: yet another lame trademark issue Mikki Barry
- [ifwp] Re: yet another lame trademark issue Craig Simon
- [ifwp] Re: yet another lame trademark issue Milton Mueller
- [ifwp] Re: yet another lame trademark issue Bill Lovell
- [ifwp] Re: yet another lame trademark issue Bill Lovell
- [ifwp] Re: yet another lame trademark issue Bill Lovell
- [ifwp] Re: yet another lame trademark issue jeff Williams
- [ifwp] Re: yet another lame trademark issue Roeland M.J. Meyer
- [ifwp] Re: yet another lame trademark issue Bill Lovell
- [ifwp] Re: yet another lame trademark issue William X. Walsh
- [ifwp] Re: yet another lame trademark issue Bill Lovell
- [ifwp] Re: yet another lame trademark issue jeff Williams
