Excessive CC's to people who probably couldn't care less have been removed.
On 23-Jan-99 jeff Williams wrote:
> Ahhhh! But yet you have a DNSO Draft proposal! Interesting. Was there
> any participation by the "Interested Parties" as required in the White Paper
> in an open and transparent manner for the development of this AIP
> draft bylaws? I appears not. So as such, like the DNSO.ORG various
> drafts, it cannot meet the requirements of the White Paper, and therefore
> was developed in a CLOSED manner. It is therefore also a unaccountable
> bylaws draft proposal.
The same argument applies to the infamous "INEG" drafts.
But then in order for the INEG draft to meet these rules we would have to have
disclosure about who INEG really is, and that is something Jeff can't possibly
let happen.
----------------------------------
E-Mail: William X. Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 23-Jan-99
Time: 14:31:33
----------------------------------
__________________________________________________
To receive the digest version instead, send a
blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___END____________________________________________
