Anthony:
I will correct your factual errors, and hope that they are honest mistakes.
Antony Van Couvering wrote:
> NSI's numbers talk about how many cases go to court. Not sufficient.
Wrong again. NSI's numbers have nothing to do with how many cases go tocourt.
NSI's numbers are a complete census of
1. how many domain names they have registered
2. how many complaints they have received about domain names
3. how many times their dispute resolution procedures have been invoked.
> As others have pointed out, the sampling methodology you used
> makes it, at best, something that can only be applied to NSI domains.
This reveals that you did not read it.There was no "sampling methodology." The
study explicitly considered
and rejected the possibility of doing a statistical sample, because there is no
access
to a database of cases that can be sampled.
If you want to see a more complete explanation of this issue
see http://istweb.syr.edu/~mueller/FAQ.htmlThe attempt to discredit the study
by applying statistical criteria to anon-statistical study has been hashed over
quite a bit and thoroughly refuted.
__________________________________________________
To receive the digest version instead, send a
blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___END____________________________________________
