Jay and all,
FIrst off Jay, the IFWP list is NOT dead. It has been delayed, but is
up and running fine now.
Second, I made this same request of Esther in the very first E-Mail I
sent to her privately regarding the ICANN having it's own Mailing
list. Openness is not in their interest it seams.
Third, The ICANN('t) has so many time now denied or ignored the
requirements that is seems hardly likely that they will entertain your
reasonable request at this time.
Jay Fenello wrote:
> Hello Esther,
>
> As we approach the public comment period
> on the various proposals expected by ICANN,
> the Internet community is left without a
> mailing list of record -- the IFWP list
> is dead!
>
> This is unacceptable!!!
>
> To accommodate the discussions surrounding
> the PSO, ASO, DNSO, and MAC proposals, I
> humbly suggest that ICANN host a generic
> policy list ASAP.
>
> At the very least, ICANN should designate
> a single external list as the list of record.
> I suspect that ORSC and others would be happy
> to host such a list, and could have one
> operational within 24 hours.
>
> This needs to be addressed quickly. To
> do otherwise is inconsistent with the open
> process requirements of the White Paper.
>
> Respectfully,
>
> Jay Fenello
> President, Iperdome, Inc.
> 404-943-0524 http://www.iperdome.com
>
>
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Contact Number: 972-447-1894
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
__________________________________________________
To receive the digest version instead, send a
blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___END____________________________________________
