Jay, The Berkman folk developed the models just as straw ones for discussion. They're absolutely not meant to exclude hybrids or anything else, for that matter, though there was some hope they could represent points along a spectrum of views. The way we broke them out might help creating some hybrids--one feature from column A, another from column B, etc. I'd love for you to post what you've got in mind, and hope that a lot of revisions to all of the models--or just alternative models--will spring from our own team as it digests the results of the Saturday workshop. ...JZ At 12:21 PM 1/27/99 , [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >It is my understanding from the Boston meeting >that the current plan for the MAC is to submit >all three proposals (Individual, Organizational, >and Open) to ICANN on February 5th for comment. > >Is this true? > >If so, can the Internet community also submit >proposals? How will the ICANN BOD reconcile >these proposals by March 5th? > >If not, how can hybrid proposals be submitted? >Many have suggested a bicameral model, one that >the MAC has been slow to embrace. > >Thanks in advance. > >Respectfully, > >Jay Fenello >President, Iperdome, Inc. >404-943-0524 http://www.iperdome.com __________________________________________________ To receive the digest version instead, send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___END____________________________________________
