Richard -
Thank you!
On your questions:
a. How does the charter of the ORSC list differ from the IFWP list as you
see it? So long as the lists are roughly interchangeable when people post,
it would make them completely redundant if they both had the same civil
discourse rules.
b. Personally, I believe that the ICANN board meetings should be open. To
ask whether the IFWP list should make that "its" view is to ask whether
there's an "IFWP" that currently exists apart from being a title to an open
list. Is there consensus on that? ...JZ
At 11:39 PM 1/28/99 , you wrote:
>The IFWP list has been moved.
...
>I have two questions I'd like to see the group address
>and come to consensus on:
>a) should this list adopt the ORSC civil discourse rules?
>(http://www.open-rsc.org/lists/rules/)
>
>b) should we stick one of Ellens grey ribbons on the
>mailing list website ?
>
Jon Zittrain
Executive Director, Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard Law School
http://cyber.law.harvard.edu
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__________________________________________________
To receive the digest version instead, send a
blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___END____________________________________________
