Andrew and all, Thank you for this information regarding "Partially merged" draft. I use that term "Partially Merged" Draft as it does not include any of the provisions of our draft that was submitted upon request to the DNSO.ORG [EMAIL PROTECTED], by request... In specific areas in brief that remain in dispute and contention are: Responsibilities of the NC Funding methods Membership specifics (Powers of decision determination in particular) It should also be noted for historical reasons if for not other, that this sort of exclusionary tactic or practice has been the Mantra of the DNSO.ORG. Andrew Q. Kraft, MAIP, Executive Director wrote: > What follows is a "draft" new draft of the AIP proposal as a merger of the > AIP, CENTRE and ORSC proposals, with parts from DNSO.org and list > discussions, as well (at least where we thought we saw some concensus). This > does not represent concensus of any or all groups, but rather is an attempt > to bring the proposals together, pulling out the coherent parts from each, > into what we hope is a coherent whole. Comments? > > Sincerely, > Andrew > > Regards, -- Jeffrey A. Williams CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng. Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC. E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] Contact Number: 972-447-1894 Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208 __________________________________________________ To receive the digest version instead, send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___END____________________________________________
