>Greg Skinner wrote: > > All I'm suggesting is that some additional text be added to > >the record, such as what the domain is to be used for. This doesn't > >have to be part of a laborious process; it is just a matter of copying > >a bit more text from the application to the whois entry. (An aside: I > >think the status, creation, last mod, etc. of the domain should be > >made public again as well.) > > > >The review period doesn't need to be six months, like it is in the > >FCC. A couple of weeks, perhaps ... long enough so that whoever is > >looking to protect their mark can do the appropriate lookup on whois. And long enough for anyone who likes the name and wants it for themselves, and who has the money to threaten a lawsuit, can make a claim for it and take it instead of the person who applied for it.
- BOUNCE [email protected]: Non-member submission from [R... Richard J. Sexton
- Re: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispute Stats Greg Skinner
- Re: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispute Stats Mikki Barry
- Re: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispute Stats jeff Williams
- Re: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispute Stats Greg Skinner
- Re: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispute St... Martin B. Schwimmer
- Re: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispu... Mikki Barry
- Re: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name D... Martin B. Schwimmer
- Re: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispu... William X. Walsh
- Re: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name D... Martin B. Schwimmer
- Re: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispu... Michael Sondow
- Re: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispute Stats Ron Fitzherbert
- Re: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispute Stats Ron Fitzherbert
- Re: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispute Stats Milton Mueller
- Re: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispute St... Martin B. Schwimmer
- Re: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispu... Milton Mueller
- Re: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name D... Martin B. Schwimmer
- Re: [ifwp] NSI Domain Na... Ron Fitzherbert
- Re: [ifwp] NSI Domain Na... Martin B. Schwimmer
- Re: [ifwp] NSI Domain Na... Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [ifwp] NSI Domain Na... Milton Mueller
