At 11:41 AM 2/4/99 -0400, Kerry Miller wrote:
>
>
>{ From: Greg Skinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>{ Subject: Re: Round robins (was: A little off topic
>{
>{ >I don't know you, but I'm a little miffed at gregbo for suggesting
>{ >this, he knows better. I'm sure he's having some fun out of it.
>{
>{ Not really. Begging the list's pardon again, giving the round-robin
>{ example was an attempt of an illustration of how a technology may
>{ support certain types of use, but if the community that uses the
>{ technology won't use it in that way, it won't be used. In the case of
>{ one site being a portal to others, if sites sharing the same name in
>{ different TLDs want to set up reciprocal or joint arrangements to
>{ handle each other's traffic, they're certainly free to do so if they
>{ choose, and the technology certainly supports it. My point is that
>{ everyone should not be forced to make these changes.
>
>Could we see secure services coming into a domain of their own?
Yes and no. A secure TLD was the original plan, but were working out a new
plan now. A secure TLD may yet be in the future. Whether or not ICANN
blesses it, we don't care. They're "ate up" anyway. A secure TLD is
self-sufficient, it has to be and that is the main benefit.
___________________________________________________
Roeland M.J. Meyer -
e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet phone: hawk.lvrmr.mhsc.com
Personal web pages: http://staff.mhsc.com/~rmeyer
Company web-site: http://www.mhsc.com
___________________________________________________
KISS ... gotta love it!
