At 2/5/99, 02:03 PM, Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
>It is the ORSC/AIP draft that has been developed by a public,
>transparent process. In Paris this was then merged with the comments by
>CENTR and supported by APTLD, LATLD and IATLD.
Correct. This merged draft is
now known as the "Paris Draft."
>> I promise to calm down and gcome back with some clarifications later.
>
>This is hardly necessary any more, both applications are submitted,
>let's see which one will be accepted.
The Paris Draft has not yet been submitted, but it
will be later tonight.
FWIW, the Paris Draft has been achieved through an open
process, one that is not meant to end with this submission.
We fully expect to use the same types of open processes to
refine this draft up until the ICANN Board meeting in
Singapore in March.
We are currently collecting signatures from individuals,
companies and organizations that support this approach, and
who would like to be included in the original submission to
ICANN. To be included, please send me an email by 9:00 p.m.
EST tonight.
[In case you miss this deadline, we will also have a
web page where you can show your support.]
I hope this answers some questions, and I'll try
and answer any others directed at me before the
night is over. (It's time to make some coffee!)
Respectfully,
Jay Fenello
President, Iperdome, Inc.
404-943-0524 http://www.iperdome.com
