Einar Stefferud writes:
> I propose that we, as a community, make <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mailign
> list our list of record and tell ICANN that we have decided this
> question for them and that we expect ICANN to abide by our community
> decision.
Ironic that Mr. Stefferud sends this article only to
the ORSC list. But I agree with his intentions though
wonder what happens if the IFWP constituency decides
to tell ICANN not to mention ORSC that they are highly
inadequate, do *not* reflect a general consensus and
must immediately disband in favour of our own, grass
roots developed, consensus generated alternative? And
what would the reaction of the USGOV and the EU be?
Or of all the other ACRONYM monkeys? Because that's
exactly what I suspect is in store if we become wise
enough to restore popular process to this insular and
self-perpetuating ICANN stroll down the psychadaellic
koo-koo land path of the imaginary kingdoms of Queen
Electronica Dyson and her shining night in survivalist
armour Sir Brittlebrains Roberts. IFWP to the rescue!
Bob Allisat
Free Community Network _ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://fcn.net _ http://fcn.net/allisat
http://robin.fcn.net
