At 2/8/99, 09:27 AM, John B. Reynolds wrote:
>
> 5.11 Further Review of Changes
>
> Whenever a proposal has been changed as a result of
> the preceding processes, any changes resulting from
> such processes shall be republished on the DNSO
> website and subject to review under the prior
> provisions of this section.
>
>My concern is that this could pave the way for repeated invocations of 5.8
>as a filibuster tactic.


Only if the FHP changes the wording on the
proposed policy.  Otherwise, there is no 
opportunity for further appeals.

Jay.

Reply via email to