At 2/8/99, 09:27 AM, John B. Reynolds wrote: > > 5.11 Further Review of Changes > > Whenever a proposal has been changed as a result of > the preceding processes, any changes resulting from > such processes shall be republished on the DNSO > website and subject to review under the prior > provisions of this section. > >My concern is that this could pave the way for repeated invocations of 5.8 >as a filibuster tactic. Only if the FHP changes the wording on the proposed policy. Otherwise, there is no opportunity for further appeals. Jay.
- Re: Useful Comments Re: DNSO process and Drafts submit... Bret A. Fausett
- Re: Useful Comments Re: DNSO process and Drafts s... Kent Crispin
- RE: Useful Comments Re: DNSO process and Draf... David Schutt
- Re: Useful Comments Re: DNSO process and ... Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- RE: Useful Comments Re: DNSO process and Drafts s... John B. Reynolds
- Re: Useful Comments Re: DNSO process and Draf... Jay Fenello
- Re: Useful Comments Re: DNSO process and Drafts s... Bret A. Fausett
- Re: Useful Comments Re: DNSO process and Draf... Kent Crispin
- Re: Useful Comments Re: DNSO process and ... Jay Fenello
- Re: Useful Comments Re: DNSO process ... Kent Crispin
- RE: Useful Comments Re: DNSO process and Drafts s... Bret A. Fausett
- Re: Useful Comments Re: DNSO process and Drafts s... Bret A. Fausett
