On Mon, Feb 08, 1999 at 11:15:14PM -0800, William X. Walsh wrote:
>
[...]
>
> This is a perfect example of a situation where the so called "sovereign"
> language Kent Crispin seems to want to enshrine can be abused.
I have proposed no such language. My position has been that *no*
language about sovereignty, pro or con, should be included.
[...]
> This is just one example of how far some people can use some of the policies
> Kent has proposed to abuse the rights of others.
I have proposed no policies, and in fact the keystone of my whole
position has been that the DNSO founding documents should contain no
statements of policy.
> These are a couple of the reasons I am absolutely opposed to the language he
> has proposed.
I have proposed no language on this topic. I proposed the removal
of language proposed by Antony and others.
--
Kent Crispin, PAB Chair "Do good, and you'll be
[EMAIL PROTECTED] lonesome." -- Mark Twain
