John B. Reynolds a �crit:
>
> The actual language of Section 9.e is a follows:
>
> e. The registrar would register SLDs to SLD holders only for fixed periods.
> At the conclusion of the registration period, failure to pay a renewal fee
> within the time specified in a second notice or reminder would result in
> cancellation of the registration.
>
> This is not significantly different from existing practice. If you do not
> renew iciiu.org or Esther does not renew edventure.com, they will expire.
It has to be taken together with "Suspension, cancellation, or transfer of
SLD assigned by mistake or where there is a dispute." If the trademarks
people have enough power in the DNSO, they will write the provisions so that
the burden of justifying the extension of the domain name is on the holder.
That is the clear intent throughout the WIPO report. If the domain name
holding is finite, and the burden of justification for extending it is on
the registrant, no one will feel safe with their domain name unless the have
trademarked it and furthermore can afford to fight about it in court with
the first comer. This is just an extension of the NSI dispute policy, a way
of making the registration of domain names a tenuous privilege, "granted" by
an unwilling semi-police authority, instead of a right.
