>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 10:30:17 -0500 (EST)
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: BOUNCE [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Non-member submission from [Pisanty
Baruch Alejandro-FQ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
>
>>From servidor.unam.mx!apisan Thu Feb 11 10:30:16 1999
>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Received: from servidor.unam.mx([132.248.10.5]) (1856 bytes) by ns1.vrx.net
> via sendmail with P:esmtp/D:aliases/T:pipe
> (sender: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
> id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 11 Feb 1999 10:30:15 -0500 (EST)
> (Smail-3.2.0.100 1997-Dec-8 #2 built 1997-Dec-18)
>Received: from localhost (apisan@localhost)
> by servidor.unam.mx (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id JAA11000;
> Thu, 11 Feb 1999 09:27:24 -0600 (CST)
>Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 09:27:23 -0600 (CST)
>From: Pisanty Baruch Alejandro-FQ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: Pisanty Baruch Alejandro-FQ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: jeff Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Williams, Walsh etc. postings
>In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
>
>Hello,
>
>hopefully my last on this issue:
>
>On Wed, 10 Feb 1999, jeff Williams wrote:
>
>> Pisanty and all,
>>
>> Agreed. You may not realize this but this is a constant mantra that
>> William Walsh has taken for some time. He is a extremely disturbed
>> individual, and it may be useful for you to recognize this when reading
>> his posts...
>
>When I read his or yours I have to look back to the "sender" field to make
>sure who wrote what. They tend to become well nigh indistinguishable to
>me. They have been a
>major disruption of the DNSO and related processes. Offline I have found
>a bunch of people who believe these postings have been a major obstruction
>and disruption.
>
>I am sure I will enjoy being roasted in a continuation of your flames and
>seriously doubt you possess the restraint required for doing so privately.
>Yet somehow I hope the many parties concerned about the evolution of the
>DNSO and related issues will find more ways to concentrate on the
>exacting tasks at hand.
>
>Alejandro Pisanty
>
>
>
>
--
The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] "It's all just marketing" +1 (613) 473-1719
Maitland House, Bannockburn, Ontario, CANADA, K0K 1Y0
