At 01:28 AM 2/11/99 -0800, you wrote:
>Let's not cange the name of the list. We don't have time to mess with
>getting everyone for figure out the cnage, etc, et al, ad nauseum.
>
>Lets just declare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to be "our designated list" for
>discussing issues with ICANN, and advise everyone how to subscribe if
>they are not yet subscribed, and then get on our work.
>
>It is clear that ICANN does not want to do the work of setting up such
>a list, so lets just route around ICANN and do it ourselves. And,
>after a short period of time we should stop all that intense cross
>posting and settle down on <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> now that Richard Sexton has
>rescued it and is administering it in a stable mode.
>
>Since ICANN does not wish to help us comunicate with them, lets just
>fix it ourselves.
>
Hey, I'll buy into this. After all is said and done, this whole scene starts
with the White Paper, and if that direction is maintained then there is less
likelihood that so many diversions into irrelevancies will occur. Has this
discussion lacked focus? HAHAHAHAHAHA!
Bill Lovell
