At 2/13/99, 04:32 PM, Kent Crispin wrote:
>On Sat, Feb 13, 1999 at 02:34:45PM -0500, Jay Fenello wrote:
>> At 2/13/99, 02:08 PM, Kent Crispin wrote:
>> >On Sat, Feb 13, 1999 at 01:01:15PM -0500, Bret Fausett wrote:
>> >> There has been much discussion about the need to give the DNSO Names 
>> >> Council some executive powers to deal with "emergency" or "pressing" DNS 
>> >> issues that may arise from time to time.
>> >
>> >"Emergency" is not a good term for it.  The actual meaning is "within
>> >a specified time".  Here is a concrete, very realistic example: ICANN
>> >has put forth registrar accreditation guidelines that include year to
>> >year contracts.  Sometime before the beginning of next term, ICANN
>> >could *very well* want policy input from the DNSO as to how those 
>> >guidelines should be changed.
>> >
>> >Here's another very concrete, time-bounded example:  NSI's contract 
>> >with the USG runs out in about two years.  Some reasonable time 
>> >before that ICANN may *very well* want policy determinations on a 
>> >number of issues.
>> >
>> >In fact, timely action could be the norm, rather than the exception, 
>> >when you think about it -- the Internet changes quickly.
>> >
>> >Consequently, I think that the ability to put time constraints, and 
>> >the ability to forward non-consensus recommendations to ICANN, 
>> >should be a fundamental facility of the decision proces.
>> 
>> 
>> Hi Kent,
>> 
>> So, you would support the policy facilitation 
>> process as defined in the Paris draft if . . .
>
>> 1) there were time limits on the combined research 
>> committee/fair hearing panel appeal process, and 
>> 
>> 2) if no consensus was reached within that time 
>> frame, it could be forwarded to ICANN as such?
>
>
>No.  


In that case, Kent, I suggest that you stop wasting 
everyone's time discussing trees, when in actuality, 
you live in another forest ;-)

As for the rest of your note, even if the whole world 
supported the BMW draft (and they don't), I'd say you 
were wrong.  We DON'T need a powerful Names Council, 
and we DO need a (general/at large/individual/pick 
your term) membership.

IMHO & FWIW.


Respectfully,

Jay Fenello
President, Iperdome, Inc.� 
404-943-0524� http://www.iperdome.com

Reply via email to