At 11:36 AM 2/14/99 -0500, you wrote:
>>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Date: Sun, 14 Feb 1999 10:53:44 -0500 (EST)
>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Subject: BOUNCE [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Non-member submission from ["A.M.
>Rutkowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
>>
>>>From ngi.org!amr Sun Feb 14 10:53:43 1999
>>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Received: from exchange.agent.org([206.5.17.29]) (5580 bytes) by ns1.vrx.net
>> via sendmail with P:smtp/D:aliases/T:pipe
>> (sender: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
>> id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 14 Feb 1999 10:53:24 -0500 (EST)
>> (Smail-3.2.0.100 1997-Dec-8 #2 built 1997-Dec-18)
>>Received: from [206.5.17.2] by exchange.ngi.org (NTMail 3.03.0018/1.acsd)
>with ESMTP id fa006245 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 14 Feb 1999 10:52:34 -0500
>>Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.24 (Beta)
>>Date: Sun, 14 Feb 1999 10:52:33 -0500
>>To: Dave Farber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Subject: Re: [IFWP] Database Bill Raises Constitutional Flags
>>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Mime-Version: 1.0
>>Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
>> boundary="=====================_72232845==_.ALT"
>>
>>--=====================_72232845==_.ALT
>>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
>>
>>Dave,
>>
>>>Some foes worry the new law could even apply to the Internet white
>>>pages directory for ".com," ".net," and ".org" sites--meaning domain
>>
>>This is an old debate that seems to be well settled
>>most other places in the world. Most registries assert
>>a copyright over the information. RIPE CENTR has been
>>active in attempting to made this a widespread norm. Most
>>seem to believe it is an effective tool in dealing with
>>privacy and spam issues. The ITU typically copyrights
>>all of its databases. I believe even the local telephone
>>directory information is copyrighted.
>>
Under Feist Publications Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co. Inc.,
U.S. Supreme Court, local telephone directories cannot be
copyrighted.
Why are we getting all that header stuff?
Bill Lovell