At 11:36 AM 2/14/99 -0500, you wrote:
>>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Date: Sun, 14 Feb 1999 10:53:44 -0500 (EST)
>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Subject: BOUNCE [EMAIL PROTECTED]:    Non-member submission from ["A.M.
>Rutkowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]   
>>
>>>From ngi.org!amr Sun Feb 14 10:53:43 1999
>>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Received: from exchange.agent.org([206.5.17.29]) (5580 bytes) by ns1.vrx.net
>>      via sendmail with P:smtp/D:aliases/T:pipe
>>      (sender: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) 
>>      id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>      for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 14 Feb 1999 10:53:24 -0500 (EST)
>>      (Smail-3.2.0.100 1997-Dec-8 #2 built 1997-Dec-18)
>>Received: from [206.5.17.2] by exchange.ngi.org (NTMail 3.03.0018/1.acsd)
>with ESMTP id fa006245 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 14 Feb 1999 10:52:34 -0500
>>Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.24 (Beta)
>>Date: Sun, 14 Feb 1999 10:52:33 -0500
>>To: Dave Farber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Subject: Re: [IFWP] Database Bill Raises Constitutional Flags
>>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Mime-Version: 1.0
>>Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
>>      boundary="=====================_72232845==_.ALT"
>>
>>--=====================_72232845==_.ALT
>>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
>>
>>Dave,
>>
>>>Some foes worry the new law could even apply to the Internet white
>>>pages directory for ".com," ".net," and ".org" sites--meaning domain
>>
>>This is an old debate that seems to be well settled
>>most other places in the world.  Most registries assert
>>a copyright over the information.  RIPE CENTR has been
>>active in attempting to made this a widespread norm.  Most
>>seem to believe it is an effective tool in dealing with
>>privacy and spam issues.  The ITU typically copyrights
>>all of its databases.  I believe even the local telephone
>>directory information is copyrighted.
>>
Under Feist Publications Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co. Inc., 
U.S. Supreme Court, local telephone directories cannot be
copyrighted.

Why are we getting all that header stuff?

Bill Lovell

Reply via email to