Stef and all,
Einar Stefferud wrote:
> BTW, I also propose that the BoD only have 10 members, plus a
> nonmember Cahir selected by the members.
Do you mean Chair here Stef? And do you also mean ELECTED, not
Selected? Please clarify.
>
>
> The applied principle is that you cannot do anything with more than 10
> or less than 100 members.
Why? We have over 80k members and we sure don't have any problems.
If you automate things correctly and set up a good voting process and
procedure it isn't that big of a problem. Of course if you don't, than you
will
have plenty of problems with coordination.
>
>
> Cheers...\Stef
>
> On Tue, 05 Jan 1999 23:47:27 -0800 I wrote:
>
> } My candidate constituencies for a DNSO are:
> }
> } 1. Root Service Providers
> }
> } 2. ccTLD registries
> }
> } 3. gTLD registries
> }
> } 4. Registrar Service Providers (includes ISPs)
> }
> } 5. DNS Zone Administrators at any level (SLD and lower)
> }
> } 6. TM Interest Organizations
> }
> } 7. Public Interest Organizations
> }
> } 8. ISPs
> }
> } 9. General Public Individuals
> }
> } 10. Other Commercial Interest Organizations.
> }
> } Now, with this much fragmentation, it woudl require that three
> } constituencies form an alliance in order to have 30% of the BoD votes,
> } and so none of these constituencies and seriously control the BoD.
> }
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Contact Number: 972-447-1894
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
__________________________________________________
To receive the digest version instead, send a
blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___END____________________________________________
