Greg and all,
Unfortunately Keiths "Ideas" are not based on any statistical data at
all,
and are therefore his "Opinion" and nothing more. However, we on the
other hand have conducted exhaustive simulations with up to 10k additional
TLD's with respect to the DNS and BIND being able to handle that many
gTLD's, and there has yet to be a major point of failure or significant
performance bottleneck.
Greg Skinner wrote:
> Dr Eberhard W Lisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Whether you do it on 2LD, 3LD or even 4LD level, it seems to work, so
> >why not on TLD level? It's mainly a matter of horse power, I'm quite
> >sure BIND is capable.
>
> There is a comprehensive discussion of the effect of adding many more
> TLDs on DNS by Keith Moore. You can find it at
>
> http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/email/late.htm
>
> It is submission #423.
>
> --gregbo
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Contact Number: 972-447-1894
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
