I am preparing an article on ICANN for a professional
association with a substantial readership.
I'm really interested in where people stand on this spectrum:
1. ICANN is an unmitigated disaster and should be resisted,
ignored or even destroyed
2. ICANN is imperfect and problematical but it is worth
investing time and effort in attempts to improve it and get it
on the right track
3. ICANN is reasonably responsive and is doing a difficult job
as best as could be expected
If you could respond by telling me whether 1, 2, or 3 best
describes your feelings I'd appreciate it. More complex
assessments are of course welcome. I won't quote anybody. Or if
I decide that your "text bite" is too juicy to resist, I'll ask
permission and make sure I spell your name right.
Please respond to me personally ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and not to the
list.
--MM
