Milton Mueller wrote:
>Another good example of the blatant irrationality of the assumptions about user
>behavior underlying the TM claims. Pizza Hut thinks that it MUST control
>"pizza-hut.co.na" exactly why?

[SNIP}
Pizza Hut now has a right to all related character strings in all
>jurisidictions, in all levels of the domain name hierarchy and regardless of
>use or degree of confusion. Quite an astounding claim. It certainly bears no
>relationship to trademark law.

Because it's late and I'm feeling wicked, how about:

pizza-hutsrus.com


Ellen Rony                                                          Co-author
The Domain Name Handbook                        http://www.domainhandbook.com
============================     //          ================================
ISBN 0879305150                *="  ____ /                  +1 (415) 435-5010
[EMAIL PROTECTED]             \     )                         Tiburon, CA
               On the Internet,    //  \\    no one knows you're a dog


Reply via email to