We're departing a bit from the relevant trademark concepts here. Yes, to register a name could be considered "use," but from the standpoint of application of trademark protection, the operative concept is "use in commerce." This means that the domain name must be used as an identifier in conjunction with the sale of goods and services. The court in Panavision v. Toeppen stated "registration of a trademark as a domain name, without more, is not a commercial use of the trademark, and therefore is not within the prohibitions of the [Dilution] Act." --MM Kent Crispin wrote: > If what you say is true, then my opinion, this is simply a case where > the law has not caught up with the facts. Clearly, blocking someone > else from using a name is a use in itself.
- Re: [IFWP] Market Structure ... Diane Cabell
- Re: [IFWP] Market Structure ... Dan Steinberg
- Re: [IFWP] Market Structure Fail... Martin B. Schwimmer
- Re: [IFWP] Market Structure ... William X. Walsh
- Re: [IFWP] Market Structure ... Mikki Barry
- Re: [IFWP] Market Structure Failure Milton Mueller
- Re: [IFWP] Market Structure Fail... Martin B. Schwimmer
- Re: [IFWP] Market Structure ... Milton Mueller
- Re: [IFWP] Market Structure ... jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Market Structure ... Martin B. Schwimmer
- Re: [IFWP] Market Structure Failure Milton Mueller
- Re: [IFWP] Market Structure Fail... Martin B. Schwimmer
- Re: [IFWP] Market Structure Failure Richard J. Sexton
- RE: [IFWP] Market Structure Failure David Schutt
- Re: [IFWP] Market Structure Failure Ellen Rony
- Re: [IFWP] Market Structure Failure clare . wardle
- Re: [IFWP] Market Structure Failure Jim Fleming
- Re: [IFWP] Market Structure Failure Martin B. Schwimmer
- Re: [IFWP] Market Structure Failure Milton Mueller
- Re: [IFWP] Market Structure Failure Jim Fleming
