Thank you Molly for clarifying that no specific notice was posted regarding the draft that was added to your web site on 17 Feb, so that there was very little effective notice to the community. It should go without saying that you must not expect all of us to constantly check your web ICANN site for new drafts to review for you, in orfer to avoid missing one and then being told that we had a chance to comment if we had only been compulsive enough to look for needles in your ICANN Haystack. Now, how do I get htis message posted to your comments mailing list? Might I ask you to post it for me, as you know where to post it and I do not. Please CC me on the copy you post for me. Thanks...\Stef >From your message Wed, 24 Feb 1999 12:08:27 -0500: } }A press release went out on Feb. 8 (to IFWP, etc.). The conflicts of }interest draft was posted later, on Feb. 17. } }> }> What was the first date of notification for each of these drafts which }> require comments from the Internet community? }> }> Is it normal to allow only 3 days? Or did I miss some earlier }> announcement. }> }> Cheers...\Stef }> }> >From your message Tue, 23 Feb 1999 15:33:57 -0800 (PST): }> } }> }Reminder: }> } }> }ICANN is soliciting comments on proposals for the domain name }> }supporting organization, draft registrar accreditation guidelines, }> }a draft conflicts of interest policy, and a draft reconsideration }> }policy. }> } }> }In order to ensure that comments will be considered by the ICANN }> }Board in advance of its March 4 meeting, please submit them before }> }midnight, U.S. West Coast Time, February 26, following the }> }instructions at: http://www.icann.org/drafts.html }> } }> }Please submit written comments even if you will be attending the }> }ICANN public forum on March 3 in Singapore, as time for commenting }> }in person at the meeting will be limited. }> }> ----- End Included Message ----- }> }> }
