hello chuck..
am on a plane to singapore and its 3am but looked over nsi proposal for
portability and found it to be very punative. the idea of requiring
a 2 year payment on domain transfers injects an unfair economic advantage to
any existing registrar as well as providing significant windfall profits for
the registry.
talking about competition and fostering an environment where we are all on a
level playing field appear here to be two different things as presented in
this NSI proposal.
to me this is not at all in the "spirit" of the transition agreement
ken stubbs
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Friday, February 26, 1999 1:16 PM
Subject: [IFWP] NSI's Response to ICANN's Proposed Guidelines
>Network Solutions' response of ICANN's request for comments
>regarding its proposed guidelines for registrar
>accreditation can be found at NSI's web site at
>http://www.netsol.com/policy/icann299/guideline-comments.htm
>l
>
>Chuck Gomes
>Vice President, Customer Programs
>Network Solutions, Inc.
>
>
>
