Re: [IFWP] Re: Trademark Enforcement at the TLD Level. WAS Re: alternate rootzone

[Bill Lovell]

At 10:54 PM 3/1/99 -0500, you wrote:
>I'm sorry I wrote that to you as a private post.
>
>OK:
>
>The right to use a trademark is recognized as a kind of property, of which
>the owner is entitled to the exclusive enjoyment to the extent that it has
>been actually used.  Hamilton-Brown v. Wolf Bros, 240 US  251 (1916).
>
>see the other cases discussed in chapter 2:14 of McCarthy's entitled
>"Trademarks are property rights."
>
>I think it's an unnecessary comma. 
>
>If I say what I want and you say what you want, they'll cite the US supreme
>court case first.
>
Go for it!! The law has with absolute certainty stood still for 80 years!

Bill Lovell