Roeland,
> They make the suggestion, but if the trademark holder disagrees then the
> judge is back to the rather one-sided choice of enforcing TM law or
> making
> new law to cover the suggestion. Judges are NOT in the law making
> business.
> It would probably take an act of Congress.
The tigher the *logical case ICANN can make, the less inclined a
TM holder may be to press a case which would likely require some
sort of substantial proof that pizza hut had in fact lost customers
to pizahut, pizzzahut, pizzahouse, etc ad nauseam. And the
logic is, we've gotten along with these 26 characters (plus ~ = and
_) for quite some time, sithout a hole hell of a kot of fontusion if I do
say so.
If the court wants to decalre the public illiterate by definiton, tho, I
suoppose these here archives ll give im precedent.
kerrrry
