Karl:
Karl Auerbach wrote:
> Once more, it is made clear to me that the only unit of interest should be
> the individual human -- one person, one vote. Giving special recognition
> (and votes) to any aggregation is an invitation to abuse and manipulation.
Sorry if I sound cynical, but by now it is quite apparent that what you call
""abuse and manipulation" is the *intended effect* of these approaches to
definition of constituencies. They are not misguided philosophies of
representation or short-term estimates of the relative strength of
aggregations. They are a bunch of TM lawyers, corporate lawyers, and registry
reps deliberately designing structures that empower themselves and not others.
> Given the number
> of business/tm and registry related constituencies, the game is pretty
> well stacked against the little-guy domain holder.)
As I said....
