Hello Michael.


Comments below :
On 09-Mar-99 Michael Sondow wrote:
>  Brian E Carpenter a �crit:
> > 
> > Tony,
> > 
> > > 1. What currently defines the current attributes of the
> > > Protocol Supporting Organization as adopted or proffered
> > > to ICANN?
> > 
> > draft-ietf-poisson-pso-bl-02
> > 
> > As I mentioned on the list recently, the appointments draft
> > is a companion to the PSO by laws draft, where your questions
> > are covered.
>  
>  The PSO bylaws, as well as the recent appointments draft, were
>  conjured up without any Internet community input, feedback, or
>  consensus whatsoever, contrary to the requirements of the U.S.
>  Government's White Paper and the ICANN bylaws, and are therefore not
>  only inappropriate but illegal. 
>  
>  The individuals who wrote them, and who are attempting to promulgate
>  them as rules of law, are doing so in full cognizance of their
>  illicit and illegal nature, and are therefore engaging in what
>  amounts to an illegal and criminal activity. 
  
Please Michael. You've stretched this one a bit too far.  The White Paper and
ICANN bylaws do not carry the force of law.  

>  The goal of this activity is control the Internet through control of
>  ICANN. This is what ISOC, in collaboration with CORE and the
>  trademark groups, is attempting to do in the DNSO, and what it is
>  attempting to do here through the IETF and the PSO.

  

----------------------------------
E-Mail: William X. Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 08-Mar-99
Time: 22:07:18
----------------------------------
"We may well be on our way to a society overrun by hordes
of lawyers, hungry as locusts."
- Chief Justice Warren Burger, US Supreme Court, 1977

Reply via email to